"I do not know why I find myself thinking of crazy things. Almost unthinkable. Almost, exactly.
totally incomprehensible though.
I reason about the universe. Maybe I'm going to shoot a bunch of crap . I apologize in advance, in this case.
But the words of professor of earth sciences (and not just the earth) made me think ...
"If there be of two-dimensional on this board, and I leaned on a piece of chalk, they do not perceive the cast in its three-dimensional ( that is how we perceive ourselves, but if he had more than three dimensions? ? beings if we were the shots on the board?) , but would see only the contact point between two-dimensional blackboard and chalk, because the three-dimensionality is not perceived by them. "
Truly the universe is what perceive us? our perception is only three-dimensional ... Time is also a dimension of space, but we do not perceive it as such. What really is the universe?
much consideration, I can find a rule "carrying" of the universe: the cause-effect relationship. O energy conservation, if you prefer.
Every small change has a cause, another "movement" above. You can go back indefinitely. Or maybe not? Because the point is: the universe has an age. So if you was not there before, what is the cause that created it? God? would always be something without a cause upstream. So, I thought to stop thinking. XD
right: if we perceive as our universe, governed by this Basic Law, said that it was not always so. Will have a chance to create del'universo? But in "Nothing" (ie "before the universe") there were no patterns of reading with which to define "regular." So what set him apart from the "random"?
That is, if we had not the definition of straight or curved and not knew them, how can we distinguish the line from the curved line?
Same thing with the universe. It is no coincidence, is ... is.
(for Incidentally, the randomness, existing, not shown, however, to obey that pattern which legitimizes the very existence? So even the "random" follows the same rules as "regular." The randomness is just an illusion, then?)
And here too, transcending the universe, our perception of this system, if the first (before the universe) the law of "cause and effect" had not existed, what would prevent the events .... just happen? Without a cause? Why are the rules, laws, which allow the events of happen. But without more, is therefore not permitted to happen to all? or nothing?
An object does not fluctuate just because the mass of Earth's him prevents. Without earth, the objects float. So, removing the law "cause and effect", the events could not start to happen for no reason?
This is unthinkable for us: every little aspect of our life is constantly adjusted eda this fundamental law, to imagine a world without it is impossible, because even our own mind is bound by that law. One can only speculate philosophically, but it would be crazy to prove it groped in any other way: all the conceivable physical man responds to the "cause and effect", so totally rule out this reasoning, it could never happen in our universe ( our = universe we perceive and present) ...
I have to say .... boh ... "
I'll leave it to end like this, with" boh. "Why .. why boh.
0 comments:
Post a Comment